The financial watchdog has refused to publish in full a leaked report into a scandal at RBS’s Global Restructuring Group (GRG).The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said publishing it would risk revealing confidential information.The report, shared with the BBC last month, accuses RBS of mistreating businesses – claims the bank denies. It follows demands for its release by the Treasury Select Committee chair Nicky Morgan MP.The FCA has promised instead to publish a summary of the report’s findings, verified by external lawyers. But Ms Morgan said the case to publish the full report was “overwhelming”.Public viewRBS’s Global Restructuring Group (GRG), which operated from 2005 to 2013, was set up to turn around businesses facing financial distress. However, the leaked FCA report found that struggling companies who were placed in the recovery group had only a slim chance of emerging from it.
Last week a group of MPs joined the Treasury Committee in calling for full publication of the report.Among other concerns, the All Party Parliamentary Group on Fair Business Banking warned the FCA could may have overlooked the full scale of the damage caused by GRG.FCA boss Andrew Bailey said such reports were “not intended for public view”, as individuals had not had the opportunity to “see or comment on adverse comments” about them.”However, I recognise that the public interest justifies greater disclosure of material.”It is therefore our intention to publish a detailed summary of the … report.”OverwhelmedIn a statement, Ms Morgan attacked the move, saying her committee had been overwhelmed by messages from former customers whose businesses “were destroyed by RBS’ GRG”.The statement added: “The committee recognises that such reports are not intended for publication, and should in normal circumstances remain confidential.”But the report is now in the hands of an unknown number of third parties. “If closure is ever to be brought to this long-running issue, parliament and the public need the account ordered by the regulator. “And so we consider that the public interest in publication in this specific case is overwhelming.”